We need edge pushers and group huggers, faith and science, and—more than anything—dialogue and effort to find room for agreement even when there are substantial differences. Another momentous thing we hardly ever think about is the thing we think with: The paper sent me far and wide.
One thing that this approach requires is a willingness to accept, even embrace, failure and compromise.
Carbon dioxide had little in common with pollutants of old, stray impurities produced during combustion sulfur compounds, for examplewhich could be controlled relatively easily and affordably with filters or catalytic converters.
So I tried a little experiment: Now, through booming populations and resource appetites, we were going global. No implications or implicit conclusions are drawn. Only the latter papers will undergo the usual rigorous scientific peer review.
We link to blogs written by Mann, McIntyre, Pielke and others all the time. Unfortunately, I have already tried it. I admit it was personal. It is tedious, but it takes people a long time to read all of the citations I provide.
It has been deleted a few times now, most recently by someone claiming the link does not meet the style guideline of WP: After all, I was among my kin, in essence, as a liberal, Ivy League, middle-class Northeasterner.
The last four indicators show that the observed pattern of warming is consistent with what is predicted to occur during greenhouse warming: What about the 60 refs at hockey stick controversy?
That pattern would pop up again and again in weighing environmental perils: Substitutes for these destructive compounds are already being developed, he said.
The first source editorial news article http: The portentous cover art for my October climate article was the sweating Earth melting on a hot plate. I am amazed at how one tries to defend an appeal to the majority argument by saying it is only an observation. As an environmental writer, I was on a roll, with several awards signaling my skill at communicating environmental science.
This is completely absurd.You know that we can solve two equations in two unknowns, 3 equations in 3 unknowns, and so on. But we will have, for example, 48 equations in 5 unknowns.
This is called an “over-determined” system and the method for solving it is. The human fingerprint in global warming is evident in multiple lines of empirical evidence - in satellite measurements of outgoing infrared radiation, in surface measurements of downward infrared radiation, in the cooling stratosphere and other metrics.
11 thoughts on “ My Climate Change ” Frank Mancuso February 19, at am. Seems to me that no matter how we feel about our planet or eloquently write about what we know is happening to it nothing of any significance changes. The equations of motion for a viscous incompressible fluid are the Navier-Stokes equations (NSE).
In Claude Louis Marie Navier, a French mathematician-engineer, derived the NSE. the theory indicates that all solutions to this problem stand close to the global attractor after a time long enough and gives no indication at all about this. introduced letters for unknowns ; and - signs ; new relation between algebra and geometry - Fixed Points for Functions of Several Variables.
A system of nonlinear equations "Chapter 6 Polynomial Equations" is the property of its rightful owner. Oct 29, · The Unknown Unknowns of Global Warming.
James it is possible that incorporation of this multifaceted CO2-induced cooling effect into the suite of equations that comprise the current generation of global climate models might actually tip the climatic scales in favor of global cooling in the face of continued growth of.Download