In totalitarian regimes bearing arms is usually forbidden and persecuted by law. It goes without saying that in different countries the problem is solved in different way. In Australia, it is testified, public safety has essentially decreased after intensified gun control.
Thus, the case District of Columbia v. But the court ruled that since he was outside the United States when the crime was committed, he was not protected.
This admonishment should never be taken literally, as it has just been a warning about difficult times coming.
In that question was answered in the Supreme Court case U.
As it has been already mentioned above, totalitarian states have a standard doctrine for registration of all the weapons and forbidding it for common citizens.
But the wording of the amendment has been a source of debate. One of these rights is stated in the Second Amendment to the Constitution, which proclaims "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
The man argued that his constitutional rights had been violated. The matter is, the USA has case law, and therefore the interpretation of the Constitution can change from case to case. The right to have and to bear arms is often disputed and has different points of approach.
From the most points of view, this right can be associated with the right for self-defense. The purpose of the amendment, and the entire Constitution, is to establish certain rights that cannot be abolished or changed by our government.
But most of these laws have only prevented the common citizen from acquiring a firearm. Much data has been collected, but in reality no true evidence for any causality has been provided. On the whole, the question of the right of bearing arms with the purpose of self defense has been discussed for ages in various philosophical, political and social writings including such writers as Aristotle in Greece, Cicero in Rome, Machiavelli, John Locke etc.
That is why the crime rate here in the united states is high but not as high as it could get if we did not have the right to bear arms. In Spain, you receive a license from the Civil Guard Authority dependently from the class of weapon and for a limited period of time.
One of the provoking areas is studying of suicide statistics. Hereby, the right to keep and bear arms is approached as a collective one and not individual. One the one hand, it is supposed that the more weapons are possessed by common citizens, the higher is the rate of firearm suicide in the state.
The other problem is of economic character. It goes without saying that for gun manufacturers it is profitable to have as much clients as possible.
They are the masters and the state is a servant, as it is in ideal democratic state. But is "the people" referring to only the militia or to all citizens in general? Meanwhile all the Jews were prohibited from manufacturing the ammunition and firearms.
Such an approach is widely criticized. This is a individual-rights model. In fact, there has been special research conducted by Martin Killias in 21 countries of the world as for the gun control. It is often claimed that when citizens have the right to keep and bear arms, they are able to keep their state subservient to them.
The Muslims, for example, generally follow the Sharia law.Essay about The Second Amendment: Americans Have the Right to Bear Arms! - The United States Constitution says that U.S.
Citizens have the right to bear arms. Even though this guarantee was written with no constraints, there are now laws that limit certain aspects of gun ownership.
The main argument is that the amendment only provides for a militia, and that the "right to keep and bear arms" is referring to militia members only. But the amendment also states that it is the right of "the people" to keep and bear arms. The right to have and to bear arms is often disputed and has different points of approach.
In details, there is a discussion on individual and collective right and also on circumstances in which bearing arms is justified. Essay on The Right to Keep and Bear Arms Words | 5 Pages.
The Right to Keep and Bear Arms The right to keep and bear arms was considered a fundamental, individual right in the original 13 colonies from the pre-Revolutionary period through the ratification of the 2nd Amendment to the US Constitution in The Right to Bear Arms Chad Hill American Government Maj.
David Thorneloe January 09, The right to bear arms is the most important liberty to American citizens. It allows people to protect themselves from other people and the government.
Essay on The Second Amendment - The Right To Bear Arms Words | 5 Pages The Second Amendment and the Right to Bear Arms The Second Amendment to the Constitution gave United States citizens the right to bear arms.Download