Good decisions and strong editorial processes designed to manage these interests will foster a sustainable and efficient publishing system, which will benefit academic societies, journal editors, authors, research funders, readers, and publishers.
Dealing with hard truths: Appeals Authors have a right to appeal editorial decisions. The funding organization the supporter or sometimes sponsor should not be allowed to influence the selection or editing of submissions, and all Academic publishing and ethics items should be clearly identified.
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. As the editor of a scholarly journal myself, I am a strong supporter of academic freedom. This enables editorial decisions to be easily deputized as should be the case when one editor is an author or is acknowledged as a contributor to a particular article, Academic publishing and ethics when one editor is presented with papers where their own interests may impair their ability to make an unbiased editorial decision.
Informing readers about research and publication misconduct Editors should inform readers if ethical breaches have occurred.
Gilley and his supporters would have us believe that making a case for colonial domination is well within those limits.
Genocide hoax tests ethics of academic publishing July 3, by Reuben Rose-Redwood, The Conversation Debates over the history of colonialism have sparked controversies on university campuses in recent years, as illustrated by the removal of a statue honoring Cecil Rhodes at the University of Cape Town in Genocide, I think everyone would agree, is a moral wrong.
These individuals should fully meet the criteria for authorship defined above… When submitting a group author manuscript, the corresponding author should clearly indicate the preferred citation and should clearly identify all individual authors as well as the group name.
Ethics in academic publishing: Journals should not permit funding organizations to make decisions beyond those about which publications they choose to fund and the extent of the funding.
Editors should apply consistent standards in their peer-review processes. Editors and board members should, whenever these are relevant to the content being considered or published, declare their interests and affiliations.
Accuracy Journal editors have a responsibility to ensure the accuracy of the material they publish. It would be published simultaneously in three journals.
Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank the Committee on Publication Ethics for the use of its flowcharts, and the panel of 25 reviewers who reviewed this document during its development.
Editors should strive to establish and maintain a database of suitably qualified peer reviewers. In issue 2, for example, nine of the 29 articles concerned Vioxx, and a dozen of the remainder were about another Merck drug, Fosamax. Contributors who do not qualify as authors should also be listed and their particular contribution described.
To date, the publisher has not released any concrete evidence related to these threats, nor have they explained whether a criminal investigation was conducted into the matter. All the blustering rhetoric of academic freedom notwithstanding, it seems there is, in fact, general agreement that scholars must have at least some sort of ethical limits to academic debate.
Hyderabad, India — city of corruption. The order of the sections does not imply a hierarchy of importance. Respecting cultures and heritage Editors should exercise sensitivity when publishing images of objects that might have cultural significance or cause offence for example, Australian aboriginal remains held in museums, religious texts, historical events.
Office of Research Integrity. Ethics of Peer Review: Whereas Beall identified 23 suspected predatory publishers in [ 1 ], he identified 1, suspect publishers [ 2 ] and 1, suspect standalone journals [ 3 ] as of Editors should expect allegations of theft or plagiarism to be substantiated, and should treat allegations of theft or plagiarism seriously.
Editors of Blackwell journals are encouraged to consult Blackwell Publishing if considering sanctions to ensure that the appropriate processes are applied. Elsevier Australia went the whole hog, giving Merck an entire publication which resembled an academic journal, although in fact it only contained reprinted articles, or summaries, of other articles.And, lastly, it is a tacit acknowledgement that an academic work which promotes a "case for genocide" is indeed beyond the bounds of legitimate scholarly debate on ethical.
These Best Practice Guidelines on Publication Ethics describe Blackwell Publishing's position on the major ethical principles of academic publishing and review factors that may foster ethical behavior or create problems. The aims are to encourage discussion, to initiate changes where they are needed, and to provide practical guidance, in the form.
Ethics in academic publishing: a timely reminder Most, if not all, academic librarians are by now familiar with the term “predatory publishing.” The JMLA is.
SAGE is committed to upholding the integrity of the work we publish. The value of academic publishing relies on everyone involved behaving ethically. The following points are only intended to give a broad overview and are not exhaustive.
We encourage our authors and editors to refer to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) website. Core practices are the policies and practices journals and publishers need, to reach the highest standards in publication ethics.
We include cases with advice, guidance for day-to-day practice, education modules and events on topical issues, to support journals and publishers fulfil their policies. Would an academic work that makes a case for genocide be fair game for publication, or is it beyond the ethical bounds of legitimate scholarly debate?Download